About BuildRevu
BuildRevu started from a simple frustration: on most projects, the record of what was submitted and what was approved lives in email threads and spreadsheets. When a question comes up two years later, nobody can answer it with confidence.
So we built the register, the submission workflow, the review tools and the approval trail as one system — where the document number, the revision, the comments and the final status are all attached to the same record.
What we hold to
One source of truth for revisions
Sequential R-numbers, immutable document numbers, and a hard gate that stops a new revision while the last one is still open.
Auditable approvals
Reviewer opinions and manager decisions are stored separately, with who decided what, when, and on which version.
Role-scoped access
Every read and write is scoped by workspace role and project membership, enforced in the database rather than the interface.
Invitation-only workspaces
People join because an admin invited them to an organization and a project — never through an open sign-up form.
Who it's for
Clients
See the approved register and the current status of every deliverable.
Consultants
Review, redline and record decisions with a defensible audit trail.
Sub-consultants
Submit within the discipline scope you were allocated.
Main contractors
Track submissions, RFIs, WIRs and MIRs in one feed.
Sub-contractors
Upload the right formats against the right document numbers.
Document controllers
Own the list, allocate approval groups, keep numbering clean.